Global J. of Engng. Educ., Vol.10, No.1 © 2006 UICEE
Published in Australia
A Career in Capacity Building
Russel C. Jones
Capacity building, as it is now understood, has been a life-long passion for the author. He has built
capacity to practice engineering in courses for his students, has developed the capacities of the
several academic units and institutions that he has worked for, and has enhanced the capacities of
several professional societies to serve the engineering profession. His current activity is directly
aimed at building the technical capacity of developing countries to enable them to join the competitive
global economy.
INTRODUCTION
The author was born and raised in western Pennsylvania,
in the USA. His family was blue-collar, and he
was born during the latter years of the Great Depression
in the USA. He was the first member of his family
to complete a college education, with a BS in Civil
Engineering from Carnegie Institute of Technology.
Initially, the author worked as a consulting
engineer for a small Pittsburgh engineering firm, but
he was soon attracted back to graduate study by a
fellowship from the National Defense Education Act
– the response of the US government to the challenge
posed by the launching of Sputnik by the Soviet
Union. The publication of his doctoral theses, Grain
Size and Loading Rate Effects on Steel, was
awarded the Collingwood Prize by the American
Society of Civil Engineers [1].
After earning a doctorate at Carnegie, he chose
an academic path. Over the years, the author
dedicated his career to engineering education, then
education more broadly, as he rose through academic
ranks. In parallel to his employment in academia,
he was active in volunteer work in the engineering
profession – an activism that continues to this date.
ACADEMIC POSITIONS
The author began his academic career as an assistant
and associate professor in the Civil Engineering
Department at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
He developed several new courses during his
eight years there, in the structural materials area, and
conducted research in his technical specialty areas.
His first effort at what is now known as capacity building
was involvement in the InterAmerican Program in
Civil Engineering, which was an MIT programme
funded by the Ford Foundation and the US Agency
for International Development, and was aimed at
upgrading the education and research activities of
selected universities in Latin America. He collaborated
with universities in Chile, Argentina and Brazil – with
heaviest involvement with the University of Chile in
Santiago. The papers titled Substructure Formation
in Cyclicly Loaded Metals and The Formation of
Cell Structures in Fatigued Iron Crystals resulted
from that collaborative effort [2][3].
The author also undertook extensive research in
fibre-reinforced metals, with the paper Fractography
on Aluminum-Boron Composites being typical of that
effort [4]. In addition, he conducted funded research
projects for the National Aerospace and Space
Administration (NASA) on the utilisation of NASA
technologies in earthbound systems methodology and
urban construction.
The MIT InterAmerican Program in Civil
Engineering was the opening wedge in what has
become for the author a career-long involvement
in the international aspects of engineering
education and capacity building. During his
eight years at MIT, he travelled extensively to
Latin America to interact with research
collaborators there, and hosted many Latin
American researchers in his laboratories in the
USA.
The author’s first step up the academic administrative
ladder was his move to the Ohio State University
to serve as its department chairman. The timing
of that move was such that his department needed to
significantly expand its environmental engineering
activities, and the author was instrumental in building
up that area through the addition of new faculty
members, more students and expanded teaching and
research activities. He also reinforced existing
programmes in response to the needs of the Ohio
Department of Transportation, and to the local
construction industry. Papers describing the Ohio State
years include Option Packages for Undergraduate
Technical Depth and Construction as an Option
within Civil Engineering [5][6]. During his years at
Ohio State, the author also organised two national level
conferences on civil engineering education, reported
in The 1974 ASCE Conference on Education: a
Review and Evaluation and Where Does Civil
Engineering Education Go From Here? [7][8].
In preparation for further administrative advancement,
the author spent an intensive summer at Harvard
Business School in the Institute for Educational
Management.
Engineering education has always engaged in
self-study and renewal, and civil engineers in
the USA have been particularly active in doing
so. The author organised two major conferences
while a civil engineering department head at the
Ohio State University, focusing on educator
practitioner interactions and the changes needed
in the curriculum to adequately prepare
graduates for several decades of effective
professional practice. In addition to bringing
together hundreds of involved educators and
practitioners for conference interaction,
publications following up the conferences
impacted a wide swathe of the profession.
A second step into academic administrative leadership
came when the author moved to the University
of Massachusetts (UMass) at Amherst as Dean of
the College of Engineering. The timing of this move
immersed him in expanding the size and scope of that
College significantly in response to the needs of the
burgeoning demands of the high-technology industry
in the 128-belt around Boston. One major achievement
during his UMass years was the rejuvenation of
a programme in microwave engineering, which
provided a much needed flow of well prepared graduates
to the state’s high tech industry. His papers began to
reflect broader interests in engineering education, such
as Engineering Education for the 21st Century [9].
One major activity was leading the first capital
campaign ever conducted at the UMass to revamp
the engineering laboratories. Fund Raising for
Laboratory Renovation reports lessons learned
during that experience [10]. While serving as Dean,
the author also hosted the annual meeting of the American
Society for Engineering Education on the UMass
campus, attracting some 3,000 participants.
As the pre-eminent engineering education
organisation in the USA – and perhaps the world
– the American Society for Engineering
Education (ASEE) attracts several thousand
participants in its annual meetings. In the days
when the society held its annual meetings on
university campuses, the author hosted one such
annual meeting on the campus where he was
serving as the Dean of Engineering – the
University of Massachusetts. He and his staff
(and family) set the tone of the conference by
arranging keynote speakers, such as Michael
Dukakis, in the time between his service as
Governor of the state and candidate for the US
presidency. They also organised all the logistics
of the conference – accommodations, meals,
field trips, family events, etc. The quality of this
conference set a high mark for successive
annual meetings.
The next major step up the academic administration
ladder was the author’s appointment as Academic
Vice President at Boston University. He was invited
to that position at the time when Boston University
wanted to make major investments in developing its
science and engineering programmes. He was active
in the design and implementation of a major new science
and engineering building complex, fund raising
for that development, the attraction of key faculty leaders
for the effort, and the expansion of educational
and research programmes. During his years at Boston
University, the author also was heavily involved in
faculty evaluation, as seen in Weighing the Criteria,
and in faculty union issues, as illustrated in Impact of
a Collective Bargaining Contract [11][12].
His final step in academic management was his
appointment as President of the University of Delaware.
During his short term as President, he emphasised
strategic planning and the improvement of the
mix of minority faculty members and students on campus.
The planning effort was described in Nine Themes
Emerge from Project Vision Review [13]. His
inability to persuade the University Trustees, heavily
dominated by elderly members of the DuPont family,
to take a progressive approach on racial balance at
the University led to his resignation – which is
described in Why I Resigned as President [14].
After stepping down as President, the author continued
service at the University of Delaware for some
time as a University Research Professor. One major
accomplishment during that period was conducting a
National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project on
technological literacy, including holding a major
national level conference on the topic. That work
is described in Technological Literacy for Non-
Engineers [15].
Convinced that the population at large needed
to better understand engineering and technology,
the author led a movement to promote
technological literacy among non-engineers.
With funding from the US National Science
Foundation, he organised a major national
conference, which brought together the leading
experts in the field, to review models and
make recommendations to the profession. The
resulting major publications, aimed at
engineering deans and faculty members,
advocated for engineering schools to offer tech
literacy courses to non-engineering students on
campus (liberal arts, business and education
majors, for example). The author himself
developed and taught such a course at the
University of Delaware.
During that period, he also returned to student
status, and earned a Master’s degree in liberal studies
at the University of Delaware – in a programme that
he had initiated while President. His Master’s
thesis was published as Education of Engineers for
International Practice [16].
In a final formal career move, the author became
Executive Director of the National Society of Professional
Engineers – a member-based organisation of
licensed professional engineers based in Alexandria,
USA. As a Professional Engineer himself, licensed in
several states, the author had been active in NSPE
committee activities. During his years as CEO of the
organisation, he stressed service to members as the
way to reverse membership decline – and was
successful in turning the membership numbers back
up. He instituted a major annual meeting for the
membership, developed insurance and other
programmes for members and streamlined the
operation of the headquarters staff. NSPE National
Meetings for All Members describes one of these
initiatives [17]. During his years at the NSPE, the
author was heavily involved in negotiations with
engineering organisations in the USA, Canada and
Mexico as the engineering profession struggled to
implement the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA). Expanding Cross-Border Engineering
Practice describes that activity [18].
When US President Clinton signed the NAFTA
agreement with Mexico and Canada, the
engineering profession was asked by the US
Government to facilitate the cross-border
practice of engineering among the three
countries. As Executive Director of NSPE, the
author and his professional colleagues were
major participants in the negotiations.
Unfortunately, the structure of engineering
licensure in the USA – where each of 55
state-level jurisdictions controls engineering
practice locally – made it impossible to get any
reasonable agreement on allowing Canadian
and Mexican engineers to practice in the USA,
short of meeting the stringent education,
practice and test requirements of each state in
which they wished to practice. So NATFA for
engineers is currently only operative between
Canada, Mexico and the State of Texas!
Having established a productive network of
contacts and activities in Washington, DC and internationally,
the author left the NSPE to work as a
consultant in an active semi-retirement. He continues
that activity today, consulting for industry
and chairing several national and international
organisations.
Working at the interface of the university and
industry over most of his career, the author built
many bridges for mutual benefit of those two
camps. While at the UMass and Boston
University in particular, he was heavily involved
in instituting mechanisms for providing industry
input to his academic units, and in gleaning
support from industry for the enhancement of
the engineering programmes he was responsible
for. Perhaps his best success was restarting and
updating a programme in microwave engineering
at the UMass, with major support from the
Raytheon Company. That programme provided
– and still provides – top quality microwave
engineering graduates at the Master’s level to
meet the needs of the high tech industry in the
128-belt around Boston and beyond.
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES
While a student, at both the undergraduate and
graduate levels, the author was active in engineering
profession organisations – particularly in the
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Then
throughout his career, he continued such professional
society involvement – expanding it in scope and
responsibility levels.
During his time at the MIT, he was elected to the
ASCE National Board of Direction – representing the
New England States. After moving to Ohio State
University, he was again elected to the ASCE Board
– this time as Director from three Midwest states,
then as Vice President for one of the four geographic
zones of the organisation. The author has served on
and chaired dozens of committees for the ASCE over
the years, and continues to serve on some. One major
activity while serving on the Board was helping the
profession come to grips with rampant unethical
conduct – primarily kickbacks from engineers to
political figures in order to get contracts. His major
paper describing those years, Kickbacks Versus
Professional Ethics, became a case study for ethics
courses for engineering students [19].
Unethical and illegal practices in the
engineering profession surface periodically in
various geographies – and the author happened
to be serving on the Board of Direction of ASCE
when a spate of cases of illegal kickbacks to
politicians by engineers came to the surface.
He and his colleagues held hearings on each
allegation of such conduct, typically ending in
expelling the involved engineers from the
Society, and asking that their license to practice
be revoked. Some of the most flagrant cases
involved Spiro Agnew, during his years as a
county executive then Governor of Maryland –
eventually leading to his resignation while later
serving as Vice President of the USA.
The author served on the Accreditation Board for
Engineering and Technology (ABET) for many years,
first as an evaluator of civil engineering programmes,
then as a member of the group that led evaluation
visits, and finally as President of the ABET. He led
the development of accreditation criteria for the
surveying and construction fields. During his term as
President, he led in the restructuring of the large,
complex Board, and initiated a move to facilitate
accreditation of graduate engineering programmes.
The first of these efforts succeeded, and the second
failed – as a majority of deans of engineering opposed
having the ABET involved in their graduate offerings.
His year as President is described in 1988 ABET President’s
Address [20]. One of the major accomplishments
during his leadership period was the establishment
of the Washington Accord, a cross-border
mutual recognition mechanism that has grown beyond
its original six members and is now the gold standard
for engineering quality assurance at the international
level. The paper, International Trends in Engineering
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, describes
these international developments [21].
The Washington Accord, destined to become
the gold standard for engineering accreditation
internationally, was developed during the
author’s term as President of the ABET. Visits
by accreditation activists among the original six
English-speaking countries led to a mutual
recognition system that treats engineering
graduates in any of the countries as if they were
graduates in the country where recognition is
being sought. The Accord has grown over the
years, with more countries being accepted
into membership, and its standards have set the
norm for engineering accreditation around
the globe.
Long active in the American Society or Engineering
Education (ASEE), the author is currently chairman
of its International Division. He has served on the
organising committees for several ASEE International
Colloquia. He previously chaired a major task force
evaluating advanced technologies for classroom and
laboratory use in engineering education – described in
Uses of Educational Technology [22].
The ASEE asked the author to chair a major
task force to evaluate the educational technology
that was creeping into the classrooms and
laboratories of engineering schools in the 1980s,
and to make recommendations on what types
of technology should be introduced and at what
pace. The resulting report – delivered in printed
form and via a nationally televised session on
the network of the National Technological
University – recommended steps engineering
schools should be taking in introducing
computers into the classroom and laboratories,
the use of video recordings to time-shift and
distance-shift continuing education for
practicing engineers, etc).
One technological application developed by the
author and several of his colleagues in more
recent years is the electronic conference, which
allows engineering educators who cannot get
to international engineering colloquia and
conferences to participate electronically.
Successful e-conferences, aimed primarily at
engineering educators in developing countries,
have been run in conjunction with annual
meetings of the European Society for
Engineering Education (SEFI) and the ASEE.
In the American Association of Engineering Societies
(AAES), the author has long served on the International
Activities Committee. He also has worked
through the AAES to conduct a major study on the
utilisation of engineers in industry, as described in the
paper Better Utilisation of Engineers – Results and
Conclusions of NSF Utilisation Study [23].
Concerned about how engineers were being
utilised in industry as computer aided design,
word processing and other advanced technologies
were sweeping the workplace in the 1980s,
the author and his colleagues obtained funding
from the US National Science Foundation and
the US Department of Defense to undertake a
major study on the utilisation of engineers.
Through fact-finding visits to interview
engineers and their managers at several major
employers of engineers, as well as a major
survey, the research team was able to glean a
clear picture of how engineers were coping in
the transition to computer support instead of
technicians and secretaries. The results of the
study were published widely and presented at
several national meetings.
During some 18 years when the USA took itself
out of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the author became
engaged in keeping vital parts of the relationship
between US engineers and UNESCO alive. He
co-chaired a committee which provided advice to the
Director General of UNESCO, and in that capacity
organised two major international conferences on
engineering education in Paris, France, at the
UNESCO headquarters. The paper, Accomplishments
of the International Committee on Engineering
Education under the Auspices of UNESCO
describes that activity [24]. One of the major
accomplishments of that period was the formation of
the UNESCO International Centre for Engineering
Education (UICEE), based at Monash University,
Melbourne, Australia. That Centre has grown and
flourished in the intervening decade, and now has a
major international network of collaborating universities.
A recent review paper in the Global Journal of
Engineering Education – which is published by
UICEE – called UNESCO-Based Efforts at Capacity
Building: from 1992 to 2005 chronicles the development
of the UICEE [25]. The author remains active
with UNESCO now that the USA has rejoined, serving
on the US National Commission on UNESCO as a
representative of the US engineering profession.
Conferences organised by the author and his
colleagues at UNESCO headquarters in Paris
in the early 1990s led to the development of
several action projects – including the formation
of the UNESCO International Centre for
Engineering Education (UICEE) at Monash
University in Australia. The Centre was
established to serve the needs of engineering
educators, particularly in developing countries,
for continued professional development. Over
the years, it has provided opportunities for such
professional updating to engineering educators
around the globe through a series of annual
conferences and the establishment of the
Global Journal of Engineering Education.
In recent years, the author has been very
active in stimulating key bodies, such as
UNESCO and the World Federation of
Engineering Organisations (WFEO), to develop
programmes in technical capacity building for
economic and social development in developing
countries. Working with the new US Ambassador
to UNESCO, he and his WFEO colleagues
were instrumental in getting the UNESCO
governing body to establish a cross-sectoral
programme in capacity building, involving its
engineering, education and ICT sectors. In
parallel with that effort, the author led in the
establishment of an active new standing
committee on capacity building within the
WFEO structure – an effort that he has chaired
since its initiation in 2003.
In the international engineering arena, the author
has been active in the Pan American Association
of Engineering Societies (UPADI) and the World
Federation of Engineering Organisations (WFEO). He
was General Chairman of the 1990 biannual meeting
of the UPADI, held in Washington, DC. He currently
serves as Chair of the UPADI Education Committee
and is a member of the team planning the 2006 UPADI
biannual conference in Atlanta. The paper, Convention
Summary, describes the 1990 meeting [26].
Long active as a member of the WFEO Committee
on Education and Training, the author was
asked in 2003 to form a new standing committee for
the WFEO – the Committee on Capacity Building,
hosted by the US American Association of Engineering
Societies. This Committee has some 40 members
from about 25 countries, and is actively engaged
in projects to develop technical capabilities in
developing countries in order to enhance economic
development. The paper titled Engineering
Capacity Building in Developing Countries to
Promote Economic Development describes recent and
current Committee efforts, with an early focus on Latin
America and an emerging concentration on sub-
Saharan Africa [27].
The initial thrust of the WFEO Committee on
Capacity Building has been the Engineering
for the Americas programme. The author and
his colleagues, working through the
Organization of American States (OAS), have
obtained formal support from the Ministers of
Science and Technology of the 34 countries of
the OAS, and the presidents of those countries,
to make the enhancement of engineering
throughout Latin America and the Caribbean a
top priority. At a major conference in Lima,
Peru, in late 2005, educators, industry leaders,
and government officials gathered to pursue
technical capacity building throughout the
hemisphere of the Americas.
Several years ago, concerned that many engineering
educators were not taking a sufficiently global view
of their field, the author founded the International
Engineering Education Digest. This monthly digest
of published articles that are of interest to engineering
educators provides summaries of key articles from
many sources, and lists the location where the entire
article may be read with the click of a mouse. It is
distributed free to some 70,000 engineering educators
around the globe through several professional
societies.
All back issues of the Digest are posted on the
World Wide Web at www.worldexpertise.com. That
Web site also contains the full texts of all
papers that the author has written or co-authored in
recent years.
Persuaded that engineering educators needed
continued stimulation in international matters if
they were to attend to adequately preparing their
graduates for international practice in the
global economy, the author founded a monthly
electronic newsletter that now goes to many
tens of thousands of engineering educators
around the world. The International
Engineering Education Digest provides
summaries of print and electronic articles of
import and interest to engineering educators,
and facilitates access to original articles for
possible follow-up by readers. It has proven to be
a popular way for busy educators to stay abreast
of developments – with the author and his
co-editor, Bethany Oberst, searching out
relevant materials and providing cogent
summaries.
RECOGNITIONS AND AWARDS
The author’s accomplishments in engineering
education and beyond have been recognised by his
election to Fellow status in several organisations,
specifically: the American Society for Engineering
Education, American Society of Civil Engineers,
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology,
American Association for the Advancement of
Science, Institution of Engineers of Ireland, National
Society of Professional Engineers, and the Royal
Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures
and Commerce (UK). He has recently been elected
to Honorary Member status in the American Society
of Civil Engineers.
In addition to the ASCE Collingwood Award
mentioned previously, the author has been awarded
the ASCE Friedman Professional Recognition Award
and the International Medal of the Australasian
Association for Engineering Education. He was named
Delaware Engineer of the Year in 1994, and was
awarded the University of Massachusetts Engineering
Alumni Association Award. He spent a year as Senior
Fellow at the American Council on Education.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
One of the author’s daughters recently asked
him, When are you going to retire? He answered as
follows:
I am as retired as I am ever going to
be – spending full time and all available
effort and resources to address some of
the major issues in the world – poverty
reduction, economic development,
technical excellence, etc. Assisting
developing countries to build technical
capacity in order to attract direct foreign
investment, to use aid monies more effectively,
and to stimulate small to medium
businesses through entrepreneurial
activity as a capstone to his academic and
professional career is proving extremely
rewarding – and effective.
REFERENCES
1. Jones, R.C. and Hribar, J.A., Grain size and
loading rate effects on steel. J. of Engng.
Mechanics Division, Proc. ASCE, October,
43-69 (1964).
2. Jones, R.C. and Joseph, G., Substructure formation
in cyclicly loaded metals. Proc. Conf.
Preprint 318, ASCE Structural Engng. Conf.,
20 (1966).
3. Jones, R.C. and Lawrence, F.V. Jr, The formation
of cell structures in fatigued iron crystals.
Metallurgical Trans., February, 1, 367-376
(1970).
4. Jones, R.C., Fractography on aluminium-boron
composites. Composite Materials: Testing and
Design, 460, 512-527 (1969).
5. Jones, R.C., Option packages for undergraduate
technical depth. Civil Engng. Educ. Related to
Engng. Practice and the Nation’s Needs, 1,
32-38 (1974).
6. Jones, R.C. and Mason, G.E., Construction as an
option within civil engineering. Civil_Engng.
Educ. – Related to Engng. Practice and the
Nation’s Needs, 1, 620-627 (1974).
7. Jones, R.C., The 1974 ASCE Conference on
Education a review and evaluation. Civil Engng.
Educ. – Responding to the Challenges of
Engng. Practice, 1, 12-24 (1979).
8. Jones, R.C., Where does civil engineering education
go from here? Civil Engng. Educ. – Responding
to the Challenges of Engng. Practice,
2, 860-865 (1979).
9. Jones, R.C., Engineering education for the 21st
Century. Proc. 9th Pan American Congress of
Engng. Educ., Mexico City, Mexico, 14
(1980).
10. Jones, R.C., Fund Raising for Laboratory
Renovation. In: Grayson, L.P. and Biedenbach,
J.M. (Eds), Education and Industry: a Joint
Endeavor. ASEE, 692-696 (1981).
11. Jones, R.C., Weighing the criteria. Faculty Evaluation:
Selected Views, Engineering Education,
ASEE, April, 684 (1986).
12. Jones, R.C., Impact of a collective bargaining
contract. Issues in Engng. – J. of Professional
Activities, 106, El3, 241-248 (1980).
13. Jones, R.C., Nine themes emerge from project
vision review. President’s Column, UPDATE,
13 October , 2-3 (1988).
14. Jones, R.C., Why I resigned as President. News
J., 26 October, A11 (1988).
15. Jones, R.C. and Kumar, T., Technological literacy
for non-engineers. Proc. 21st Frontiers in Educ.
Conf., West Lafayette, USA, 179-184 (1991).
16. Jones, R.C., Education of engineers for international
practice. Proc. 4th World Conf. on
Engng. Educ., St Paul, USA, 3, 268-273 (1995).
17. Jones, R.C., NSPE National Meetings for all
members. Engng. Times, November, 7 (1995).
18. Jones, R.C., Expanding cross-border engineering
practice. Engng. Times, June, 5 (1998).
19. Jones, R.C., Kickbacks versus professional
ethics. Engng. Issues – J. of Professional
Activities, 101, El3, 357-364 (1975).
20. Jones, R.C., 1988 ABET President’s Address.
1988 Annual Report, New York: ABET, 5-8 (1989).
21. Jones, R.C. and Oberst, B.S., International trends
in engineering accreditation and quality assurance.
Proc. SEFI Annual Meeting, Paris, France
(2000).
22. Jones, R.C. (Chairman), Uses of educational technology.
Quality of_Engineering Education. Final
report of task force, Washington, DC: ASEE, September
1986, 73-122 (1986)).
23. Jones, R.C. and Weinschel, B.O., Better utilization
of engineers – results and conclusions of NSF
Utilization Study. Proc. IEEE Careers Conf.,
Boston, USA, 35-54 (1985)
24. Jones, R.C., Johnson, G.R., Jensen, H.P. and Lih,
M.M., Accomplishments of the International
Committee on Engineering Education under the
auspices of UNESCO. Proc. SEFI Conf. on
Engng Educ.: Rediscovering the Centre,
Copenhagen, Denmark (1999).
25. Jones, R.C., UNESCO-based efforts at capacity
building: from 1992 to 2005. Global J. of Engng.
Educ., 9, 2, 105-109 (2005).
26. Jones, R.C., Convention summary. Pan
American Engineers - Partners for Progress,
29-46 (1991).
27. Jones, R.C., Engineering capacity building in
developing countries to promote economic development.
Proc. Annual Meeting of the European
Society for Engng. Educ., Ankara, Turkey
(2005).
BIOGRAPHY
Russel Cameron Jones is a private consultant, working
through World Expertise LLC to offer services to a
select clientele. He is the Editor of the International
Engineering Education Digest, a periodic electronic
newsletter. Prior to forming World Expertise LLC as
Managing Partner, he served as the Executive Director of the National Society of
Professional Engineers, an individual member society
for the licensed professional engineer with offices in
Alexandria, USA. Dr Jones received his education at Carnegie
Institute of Technology, earning degrees in civil
engineering and materials science. Prior to returning
to Carnegie for his doctoral study, he worked as a
practicing civil engineer. He has spent much of his
career as an educator, starting with engineering
education and broadening to higher education as a
whole. After completing his doctoral degree in 1963,
he taught for eight years on the faculty of the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He then served
in a succession of administrative posts in higher
education, for several years each: Chairman of Civil
Engineering at Ohio State University, Dean of
Engineering at the University of Massachusetts,
Academic Vice President at Boston University, and
the President and University Research Professor at
the University of Delaware.