INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION DIGEST
7 July 2003
Copyright © 2003 World Expertise LLC – All rights
reserved
A periodic electronic newsletter for engineering education
leaders,
edited by Russel C. Jones, Ph.D., P.E., with Bethany S.
Oberst, Ph.D.
CONTENTS
International developments
- Higher
education as global private enterprise
- New
rules for Japanese research funding
-
Kenya
decreases government control of universities
- New
global ethic for engineers
- US
visas for academics given priority
-
India
targets R&D leadership
- US
rejuvenates UPADI relationships
U.S.
developments
- US
Supreme Court rules on affirmative action
- Class
of 2003 faces challenging job market
- Congressman
proposes free access to results of federally funded research
-
US
security depends on global science
-
New Jersey
delays
University
of
Phoenix
decision
- Americans
support legislation limiting tuition increases
- Foreign
language program support suggestion
-
US
Supreme Court refuses appeal on “research
exception” principle
Distance education, technology
- Video
conferencing results reported
- Lawsuit
may cloud future of Linux
- Virtual
global Internet research lab established
- New
technologies pinpoint location, may threaten privacy
- Notebook
computer sales top desktops
- Wi-Fi
grows; will the bubble burst?
- School
to train video game designers
Students, faculty, education
- Applying
learning science to universities
- Support
needed for students from low-income families
-
US
higher education seen as good investment
- Advice
on becoming a global engineer
- ‘Being
President’ vs. ‘Doing President’
- Improving
quality while reducing costs
Journal
- European
Journal of Engineering Education
Meetings
- WFEO/ASEE
International Colloquium, June 2003
- ASEE
Annual Meeting, June 2003
- Frontiers
in Education Conference, November 2003
____________________________________________________________
International developments
1) Higher education as a global private enterprise has
received extensive coverage recently, as both major and minor players have made
strategic moves.
The Chronicle of
Higher Education published an article written by Goldie Blumenstyk, on
higher education companies which have stepped up their global presence. Sylvan
International Universities Network (
USA
), for example, is established on four continents, enrolls 86,000 students, and
expects to make US$100M in profits this year on revenues of US$410M. Apollo
International (USA) is not nearly as large, but it is now aiming at the same
market, Latin American, that Sylvan is targeting. Driving this attention is the
exploding demand for higher education in rising middle classes throughout the
world, and national governments’ inability to keep pace with demand.
Brazil
is an attractive target, as is
India
. (See http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/i42/42a02101.htm)
The same Chronicle of
Higher Education writer also reported another acquisition: Corinthian
Colleges, Inc., (USA) said it plans to purchase CDI Education Corporation of
Canada for about US$37M, thus gaining 45 colleges and about 6,100 students.
CDI, which trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange, operates corporate
training programs as well as post-secondary programs in business, allied health
and information technology. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/06/2003062603n.htm)
Sylvan Learning Systems’ University of the
Americas
in
Chile
is the subject of a dispute. Most
of its students have grades too low to quality them for admission into other,
more traditional, universities. According to its administrators, these students
benefit from its remedial programs and are given a chance for an education that
was previously unavailable to them. According to members of
Chile
’s academic establishment, the University of the
Americas
is raising unrealistic hopes, might not be worth its high tuition, may not have
high quality standards, and so on. It
doesn’t help that public universities in
Chile
traditionally run deficits while the University of the
Americas
, under Sylvan’s direction, grows fast and makes a profit. The article was
written by Burton Bollag for the Chronicle
of Higher Education. (See http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/i42/42a02301.htm)
For other coverage, see http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/i42/42a03401.htm,
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/i42/42a0240l.htm,
and http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/06/2003062502n.htm.
2) New rules are shaking up the system for basic research
funding in Japan, according to an article by Dennis Normile in the June 27th
Science. Proposals drawn up by the
Council for Science and Technology Policy include opening funding up to
private-sector researchers, giving institutions more flexibility to hire staff
and manage funds, reimbursing institutions for overhead costs, and hiring
scientists as grant administrators. Government officials will spend the next
year drawing up guidelines to implement the reforms. (See http://www.sciencemag.org)
3)
Kenya
’s President Mwai Kibaki decreased government control of his country’s
universities by giving up his role as chancellor and instead appointing seven
others to replace him. He further
promised to perpetuate this act by passing legislation prohibiting other
presidents from controlling public universities.
The government also moved to permit faculty to create trade unions.
(See http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/07/2003070204n.htm)
4) A new global ethic for engineers is outlined by Joel
Cuello in the Summer 2003 issue of The
Bent of Tau Beta Pi. Paraphrasing a
statement by the Chairman of Ford Motor Company, the author states that “A
good engineering professional organization delivers excellent products and
services, while a great one delivers excellent products and services and strives
to make the world a better place”. This article details the need, the theory,
and the practice for a new global ethic for engineers. Cuello develops a four
point approach, dealing with unforeseen effects, best usage, high-level
technology development, and position statements. (See http://www.tbp.org)
5) Reporting a step in the right direction, Michael Arnone
of the Chronicle of Higher Education
writes that the US State Department has instructed its overseas consular offices
to put students, professors and researchers first in line for the in-person
interviews that are now part of the visa application process.
The four groups which had advocated a postponement of the new procedure,
pointing out the serious impact which delays would have on higher education,
were the Association of American Universities, the American Council on
Education, the Council of Graduate Schools, and the National Association of
State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. They expressed their appreciation
for this latest development. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/07/2003070301n.htm)
6) India is taking steps to reposition itself as a global
R&D leader, according to an article by K. C. Krishnadas in the May 19th
EETimes. Currently seen as a source
for low cost technical labor and services,
India
is planning to revamp its image as a center for technological excellence and
innovative engineering. Its Department of Information Technology is studying how
to promote the country as a global research and development destination for IT.
The scientific advisor to the country’s prime minister says that in order to
be a global competitor,
India
will have to design, develop and produce its own hardware. These moves are
driven by national security concerns as well as economic motivations. (See http://www.eetimes.com/story/OEG20030519S0037)
7) The National Society of Professional Engineers and the
American Society of Civil Engineers have recently teamed up to rejuvenate the US
relationship with UPADI, the Pan American Union of Engineering Associations,
according to an article in the July 2003 Engineering
Times. The purpose of the partnership is to further the interests of US
engineers throughout the
Western Hemisphere
, and to strengthen ties among engineering societies and individual engineers in
the region. The two
US
societies have appointed a joint task force to promote increased activity in
UPADI, including involving US engineers in its several committees. (See http://www.nspe.org)
U.S.
developments
8) On Monday, June 23, the United States Supreme Court
handed down a decision upholding the use of affirmative action in the selection
of students for admission into college, but rejected the specific admission
policy used by the
University
of
Michigan
’s
College
of
Literature
, Science, and the Arts as not being narrowly tailored enough to its goal of
achieving diversity. This decision
marked the first time that the court had directly addressed the contentious
issues since 1978, when quotas for admission were struck down in Regents
of the University of California v. Bakke.
At that time, however, an opinion written by Justice Lewis F. Powell,
Jr., expressing the majority opinion of the other members of the court, stated
that it was legal for colleges to afford special consideration to race in
efforts to achieve diversity in their study body.
The initial report on the court’s finding was written by Peter Schmidt
in the Chronicle of Higher Education. (See
http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/06/2003062305n.htm)
As expected, both sides of the intense controversy claimed
victory. Because the court upheld
the University of Michigan Law School’s admissions policy, which takes into
consideration race and ethnicity of applicants, supporters of affirmative action
are claiming that a huge victory has been won, and that consequently,
affirmative action can continue to be used in college admissions.
On the other hand, because the court rejected the University of Michigan
College of Literature, Science, and the Arts’ practice of assigning an
automatic 20 bonus points to black, Hispanic and American Indian applicants,
(amounting to the difference between a 3.0 or B grade average and a 4.0 or A
average), opponents of affirmative action claim that the system has suffered a
serious defeat. Peter Schmidt was
again writing for the Chronicle of Higher Education. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/06/2003062401n.htm)
What may not be apparent to readers less familiar with
US
higher education is that the Supreme Court rulings will have little effect on
the majority of
US
college and universities which are not selective in their admissions policies.
Relatively few institutions receive more applications than they have
openings. But for those institutions
which are covered by this decision, both public and private, the court decisions
will cause soul-searching, legal wrangling and a look at staffing levels in
admissions offices. Jeffrey Selingo
wrote this for the Chronicle of Higher
Education. (See http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/i43/43s00501.htm)
One predicted result of the court’s decisions on
affirmative action is likely to be a return to consideration of race in the
award of financial aid, a practice that was either quietly or loudly abandoned
during the 1990s under pressure from state officials wrestling with ambiguous
laws and lower court findings. In
Texas
, in particular, the result of the recent decisions could be important, since
the institutions in that state had turned to private donors and various other
independent organizations to provide money for race-conscious awards.
Sara Hebel wrote this for the Chronicle
of Higher Education. (See http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/43s00601.htm)
9) The graduating class of 2003 faces a challenging job
market, according to an article by Danielle Boykin in the July 2003 Engineering
Times. With the unemployment rate above 6%, many of this year’s graduates
are finding that the days of multiple job offers, high salaries, perks, bonuses
and dream jobs are gone. About 42% of employers responding to NACE’s ‘Job
Outlook 2003 Spring Update’ indicated that they were going to cut college
hiring. And although over half of the firms surveyed indicated that they would
hire about as many graduates as last year or more, last year’s hires were down
36% from the previous year. The survey did show that people with degrees in
business, engineering and education had the best prospects for finding jobs,
however. (See http://www.nspe.org)
10) Although he lacks the required co-sponsor,
US
Representative Martin Olav Sabo of
Minnesota
has introduced a bill into Congress stipulating that research papers produced
with “substantial” federal funding would be ineligible for copyright
protection. This would allow free
public access to these works. The
bill is consistent with the approach being taken by a group called the Public
Library of Science, headed by Harold Varmus, former director of the US National
Institutes of Health. Jeffrey Brainard, reporting for the Chronicle of Higher Education, said that Sabo’s staff expects the
bill to receive co-sponsors and to stir up debate.
(See http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/06/2003062702n.htm)
11) The June 20th issue of Science contains an editorial entitled “Global Science and US
Security”, written by David Galas and Henry Riggs. The authors state that
while the
US
scientific enterprise is currently superb, we must recall that in virtually
every field it has been leveraged by the global scientific community. In a
tight-knit relationship, global science has been fueled by US initiatives: money
for research, competition for funding, an emphasis on innovation, and a powerful
scientific culture. But the
US
is fully dependent upon the international scientific community for its own
technical strength in areas such as commercial, educational, and defense
research and development. The authors are concerned that moves by the
US
such as immigration restrictions, limits on who can do research in sensitive
areas, and government imposed restrictions on publication of research results
will limit international collaboration – and blunt the
US
technology edge. (See http://www.sciencemag.org)
12) In a surprise move, the New Jersey Commission on Higher
Education decided to delay until September 26 a vote on an application by the
University of Phoenix to open a campus in that state.
Higher education officials had so strongly opposed a similar move in 1998
that the
University
of
Phoenix
withdrew its application. In the
intervening years
Phoenix
arranged for library resources, strengthened the general education component of
its curriculum and increased faculty-student contact.
This most recent delay will force
Phoenix
to comply before the final date with requirements they intended to fulfill
after receiving approval. Both
stories on this topic were written for the Chronicle
of Higher Education by Will Potter. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/06/2003062704n.htm,
and http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/07/2003070108n.htm)
13) The
US
Educational Testing Service recently released results of a survey which
indicated that Americans in large numbers support their system of higher
education in all aspects but one: its cost. Almost 75% of those surveyed
supported the notion of the federal government limiting college tuition
increases to around the cost of living, according to an article in the Chronicle
of Higher Education written by Elizabeth Crawford. (http://chronicle/com/daily/2003/06/2003061906n.htm)
14) Stanley Kurtz, a research fellow from
Stanford
University
’s Hoover Institution, recommended to the US House of Representatives’
Subcommittee on Select Education that US$20M given to Title VI programs in the
aftermath of September 11 be reallocated to the Defense Language Institute.
Federally-funded Title VI programs are foreign-language and areas
studies. According to Mr. Kurtz,
they are biased against
US
foreign policy and discourage students from working for the
US
government. He also recommended that an oversight committee for Title VI
programs be created to manage the programs and eliminate this anti-US bias.
Rebutting Mr. Kurtz, Terry Hartle from the American Council on Education said
that the real heart of the controversy was not Title VI programs in general, but
the 15 Title VI programs that focus on the
Middle East
. He claimed an oversight committee
would be subject to political influence. This report was written by Elizabeth
Crawford for the Chronicle of Higher
Education. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/06/2003062002n.htm)
15) The US Supreme Court’s refusal to consider an appeal
in a patent case left
Duke
University
very disappointed. At issue is the “research exception” principle which
allows researchers to use tools or procedures freely if they are engaged in
non-business investigation. Duke and the other institutions that supported Duke
believe that this decision to let stand a lower court decision seriously
threatens the conduct of university research, according to an article written by
Goldie Blumenstyk for the Chronicle of
Higher Education. (See http://chronicle.com/daily/2003/06/2003063001n.htm)
See also an article in the June 13th Science, entitled ‘Academia gets no help from the
US
in patent case’, which quotes the
US
Solicitor General as saying that academia’s worries about the patent ruling
are overblown. (See http://www.sciencemag.org)
Distance education, technology
16) In a comprehensive report, Florence Olsen of the Chronicle
of Higher Education writes about the
University
of
Arizona
’s four years of experience with video conferencing at its Eller College of
Business and Public Administration. Two groups of students have now graduated
from its “electronic-classroom M.B.A. program,” all residents of the
Silicon Valley
in
California
, where they attend classes in the 3Com Corporation’s headquarters in
Santa Clara
. The TeleSuite system used by the
University
of
Arizona
is known as immersive videoconferencing, a far cry from earlier systems.
Its high cost – US$17,000 per month – buys the university high
resolution, a customized classroom, and a nearly life-sized screen.
University officials say they want to use the program to serve more
California
students. Other
US
universities have made substantial investments in videoconferencing for other
reasons.
Duke
University
uses videoconferencing not for instruction, but for meetings between faculty
and staff on the home campus and in
Germany
. The
University
of
Pennsylvania
uses it to enrich the programs at its
Wharton
School
with guest speakers from distant locations.
Ohio
State
uses videoconferencing to obtain a critical mass of students for specialized
graduate programs. Many questions
remain, however, about the value, in terms of actual learning, of the high
priced videoconferencing facilities as compared with lower priced versions.
(See http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/i43/43a02401.htm)
17) An obscure
Utah
software company is pursuing a legal dispute with IBM over the Unix operating
system, which may impact the future of Linux. According to an article in the
June 19th The Economist, the
SCO Group has accused IBM of illegally copying code from Unix to Linux, and is
claiming $1-billion in damages. IBM denies any wrongdoing, and claims that its
1980’s contract with AT&T (which originated Unix) is irrevocable and
perpetual. The rights to Unix eventually ended up in the hands of SCO. The SCO
lawsuit seems to have done little to hamper the adoption of Linux by large
firms. See (http://www.economist.com)
18) A group of researchers has launched a new virtual
global Internet research lab, according to an article in the June 27th
Science by Robert Service. Called
Planet Lab, the collaboration consists of 60 researchers from 16 countries as
well as from Intel and Hewlett-Packard. The new partnership aims to build a
proving ground for applications that could enable the Internet to monitor itself
for viruses and worms, recall Web pages long after they have disappeared, and
develop other powerful new capabilities. Researchers aim to test a broad
spectrum of applications with a network of 1000 computers. (See http://www.sciencemag.org)
19) New technologies can pinpoint your location at any time
and place, according to an article in the June 2003 IEEE Spectrum by Jay Warrior et al. These technologies promise
safety and convenience, but also threaten privacy and security. One example of
the coming wave of wireless communications technologies is the RF-ID tag, which
contains a chip that responds to an RF field from a scanner. They are small and
inexpensive enough to be used in grocery store products for inventory management
– but can contain unique identifying codes that allow them to be traced back
to the store from which the item was purchased. Another application of wireless
technology is Enhanced 911, where wireless carriers are required to be able to
locate within 50 to 100 meters any wireless phone calling 911. Cell phone
providers are currently scrambling to use the GPS satellite system to enable
such pinpointing. (See http://www.spectrum.ieee.org)
20) Notebook computer sales surpassed sales of desktop
computers for the first time in May, according to a note in the July 3rd
Wall Street Journal. Notebooks
accounted for more than 54% of the $500-million in retail computer sales in May,
as reported in a survey by the NPD Group. The surge in notebook computers is
attributed to greater interest in being able to take your computer on the go.
The survey also reported that May was the first time that liquid crystal display
monitor unit sales volume surpasses cathode ray tubes. In May 2002 LCD’s were
only 22% of total monitor sales, but by May 2003 LCD sales more than doubled to
capture 52% of the market. (See http://www.wsj.com)
21) Is the ‘Wi-Fi’ wireless internet boom about to turn
to a bust? An article in the June 26th The Economist asks this ominously familiar question. A research firm
estimates that 15-million Wi-Fi adapters for computers were sold last year, and
4.4-million access points. Alongside this boom in private use of the technology,
many firms have rushed to set up public ‘hotspots’ in airports, hotels,
shops and restaurants – hoping to charge for Wi-Fi access. Public hotspots are
expected to number more than 70,000 this year, even though there is little
evidence of demand for them. The best known network of hotspots to date is
operated by T-Mobile, a wireless operator, in over 2000 Starbucks shops in the
US
. But only some 25,000 people are accessing these hotspots each week, which
averages out to less than two users per day per hotspot. The cost of connecting
each hotspot to the Internet is several hundred dollars per month. And a
subscription to one network of hotspots does not entitle you to use others.
Wi-Fi will likely continue to spread and remain popular – but like other
elements in the dot.com world, it may disappoint investors. (See http://www.economist.com)
22) Southern Methodist University is starting the first
school in the US to train video game designers, according to a note by Charles
Haddad in the July 7th Business
Week. Grads of the 18-month program could start out earning $48,000 in an
industry that is adding 5000 jobs per year. The
Dallas
university expects some 40 students to pay $37,000 for the graduate program,
which starts in the fall. (See http://www.businessweek.com)
Students, faculty, education
23) Writing in the July/August Change magazine, Diane Halpern and Milton Hakel argue for applying
the science of learning to the university and beyond. They observe that the
preparation of virtually every college teacher consists of in-depth study in an
academic discipline, but that very little of their formal training addresses
topics like adult learning, memory, or transfer of learning. The authors state
the first and only goal for colleges and universities: teach for long-term
retention and transfer. They list ten basic principles, drawn from what is known
about human learning, to enhance education in pursuit of this goal. (See http://www.heldref.org)
24) Admission to US universities is skewed toward rich
kids, according to an article in the July 7th Business Week by Laura D’Andrea Tyson. To break the cycle, poor
applicants deserve special consideration, according to the writer. In the
information age, higher education is more and more important as the ticket to
economic success. But unfortunately, access to this ticket depends on economic
success itself. Children from low-income families are much less likely to
graduate from college than those from high-income families. The author argues
that students from low-income families must be helped to get a ticket to
college. She says that colleges and universities should mount more aggressive
efforts to identify and recruit qualified students from low income families,
then provide adequate financial aid to allow them to study. (See http://www.businessweek.com)
25) US higher education is a good to very good investment,
according to 96% of Americans, as reported in a survey cited in the June 19th
USA Today. But more than half identify
rising tuition costs as the major problem facing higher education, and about the
same percentage say the nation falls short in ensuring that people from all
backgrounds have access to higher education. The poll, conducted by Educational
Testing Service, also reports that 66% of respondents are willing to pay more
taxes to increase financial support for college students, while 61% are willing
to pay more taxes to increase support to colleges and universities. (See http://www.usatoday.com)
26) Advice about becoming a global engineer is given to
students by Terrance Malkinson in the June issue of IEEE-USA Today’s
Engineer. The author states that to be successful in today’s global
workforce, a graduate must be competent in both technical skills and in many
other critical skills, including personal, social, business, and global
literacies. He lists some 16 needed ‘soft’ skills, and offers advice on
where to get assistance in developing them. (See http://todaysengineer.org/June03/global.asp)
27) An engineer who has served as a university president
for two decades, Steven Sample of the
University
of
Southern California
, offers advice to others interested in pursuing academic administration
positions in the Summer 2003 issue of The
Bent of Tau Beta Pi. He differentiates between ‘being president’ and
‘doing president’, noting that while many want the perquisites and
deferential treatment which accompany high academic office, it is equally
important for them to want to contribute something great and lasting to their
followers and the organization they comprise. (See http://www.tbp.org)
28) Improving quality while reducing cost in higher
education is a challenge explored by Carol Twigg in the July/August Change
magazine. The author notes that US universities continue to be challenged by
the need to increase access to higher education, to improve the quality of
student learning, and to contain or reduce the rising costs of instruction.
These elements are of course related, and in the past improving access or
improving quality has meant increasing costs. But colleges and universities have
not yet begun to realize the promise of technology to improve the quality of
student learning, increase retention, and reduce the costs of instruction. The
article describes redesign projects to make the teaching and learning process
more active and learner centered, including projects that replace lecture time
with individual and small group activities – often in computer labs. Applying
technology is not beneficial without good pedagogy; but technology is essential
to move good pedagogical practice to a scale where it can affect large numbers
of students. (See http://www.heldref.org)
Journal
29) The September 2003 European
Journal of Engineering Education contains two papers from the 2002 SEFI
annual meeting in Florence, and ten additional peer reviewed papers on
engineering education. One of the conference papers, “Are current engineering
graduates being treated as commodities by employers?”, was written by the
editors of this Digest. The other
papers cover such topics as fitting engineering education into new patterns in
European higher education, evaluation of engineering programs, engineering
practice needs, project based learning, and active learning. (See http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals)
Meetings
30) The WFEO/ASEE International Colloquium was held from
20-23 June 2003 at
Nashville
,
Tennessee
. Planning committee chair Lyle Feisel opened the meeting with a plenary session
featuring World Federation of Engineering Organizations President Jose Medem,
who described several needs: continuous improvement in engineering education,
lifelong learning for practitioners, public understanding of science and
engineering, reversing the decline in engineering enrollments, international
expertise for engineers, mutual recognition across borders, and consolidation of
the many organizations concerned with engineering at the international level.
This was followed by a presentation by Ernest Smerdon who dealt with global
challenges for engineering education: how to broaden engineering education
without losing technical strength, how to adapt to the learning styles of
students, the cost of an engineering education, benefits of and issues with
virtual universities, practice oriented degrees, etc. The colloquium proceeded
with keynote presentations and breakout sessions on three tracks: Continuing
Education and Its Delivery, International Recognition of Qualifications, and
Developments in Teaching and Learning. It concluded with summaries of papers
that had been submitted to an electronic conference held prior to the
colloquium, and a briefing for international participants on The Current Status
and Future Directions of Engineering Education in the
United States
. (See http://www.asee.org/conferences/international2003/)
31) The 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition was held
from 22-25 June 2003 in
Nashville
,
Tennessee
. Keynote speaker was Shirley Ann Jackson, President of Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute. She stressed that engineering students need more broadening, but that
in order to accomplish that as well as to allow more technical depth in emerging
fields, we must move to a graduate degree as the first professional degree. Also
noting that engineering enrollments are down at a time when more engineers are
needed, Dr. Jackson argued that we must attract a new clientele – women,
minorities, handicapped – a group she dubbed ‘the new majority’. The
meeting followed with hundreds of papers in breakout sessions sponsored by the
various divisions of ASEE. Three distinguished lectures capped the
presentations: Elaine Seymour on Knowing What Students Know, Joseph Bordogna on
US Graduate Engineering Education, and David Billington on The Interaction of
Engineering and Society. The conference ended with its traditional Awards
Banquet, honoring the annual crop of deserving awardees. (See http://www.asee.org/conferences/annual2003/)
32) The next Frontiers in Education Conference, sponsored
by IEEE and ASEE, will be held at the
University
of
Colorado
–
Boulder
from 5-8 November 2003. Keynote speaker will be William Wulf, President of the
National Academy of Engineering. Papers and panels will be offered in parallel
tracks, covering dozens of topics in engineering education. (See http://www.fie-conference.org)
________________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from this
newsletter service, please respond to digest@worldexpertise.com
with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. Send address changes to the same
e-mail address.
To contribute information to
this electronic newsletter, please send it by e-mail to russel_jones@worldexpertise.com
This Digest provides summaries
of published articles, both printed and electronic. World Expertise does not
endorse or corroborate the information in these articles. Some publication web
sites may require user registration before access is granted to articles via the
links provided above.
Back issues of this
International Engineering Education Digest can be read on the Web at http://www.worldexpertise.com